Our disappearing commissioners: how many is enough?

/

The CRTC was envisaged to be governed by a chairman making decisions with the assistance and agreement of a number of commissioners, insofar regulatory policies are concerned. Otherwise I could see no need to mention their existence in the CRTC Act.  The law allows for the appointment of up to 13 of them. The Governor in […]

Read more »

Hats off to the CRTC

/

The CRTC got it basically right yesterday. While it did not climb down from its position that video on the Internet is subject to its jurisdiction, it made the correct decision that the broadcasting regime was to be more assimilated to the Internet than the other way around. See its treatment of licensed on-demand services […]

Read more »

Next generation 9-1-1

/

Our planning for it is deplorable, at the moment. An Internet-centric 9-1-1 needs to be planned by people who understand the Internet. Does this not seem obvious? Then why is our planning process excluding them? Because we have no adequate planning process. Here is a presentation I made at the Toronto ISP Summit in November […]

Read more »

Presentations and Conference Papers

/

This continues the work of François Ménard and me in “Paradigm Shift for the Stupid Network“, in which I bring together the contrast between the “End-to-end Principle” and the legacy networks, tie it in to access to high-speed facilities, and why Canadian telecom policy, like that in the United States, seems not to understand what […]

Read more »

Changing technology is creating new value

/

In my time as Commissioner at the CRTC, the most significant accomplishment was turning down the proposal to regulate the Internet under the Broadcasting Act. I have posted my concurring opinion in new media, the term for the question whether the Broadcasting Act should be applied to the Internet in Canada. See also my more […]

Read more »
To top